Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0601
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 162, Issue 1, 11-18
Copyright © 2010 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
EJE-09-0601v1
162/1/11    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kokshoorn, N. E
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kokshoorn, N. E
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M

REVIEW

Hypopituitarism following traumatic brain injury: prevalence is affected by the use of different dynamic tests and different normal values

Nieke E Kokshoorn, Moniek J E Wassenaar, Nienke R Biermasz, Ferdinand Roelfsema, Johannes W A Smit, Johannes A Romijn and Alberto M Pereira

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases C4-R, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

(Correspondence should be addressed to N E Kokshoorn; Email: n.e.kokshoorn{at}lumc.nl)

Abstract

Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has emerged as an important cause of hypopituitarism. However, considerable variations in the prevalence of hypopituitarism are reported. These can partly be explained by severity of trauma and timing of hormonal evaluation, but may also be dependent on endocrine tests and criteria used for diagnosis of hypopituitarism.

Methods: Systematic review of studies reporting prevalence of hypopituitarism in adults ≥1 year after TBI focusing on used (dynamic) tests and biochemical criteria.

Results: We included data from 14 studies with a total of 931 patients. There was considerable variation in definition of hypopituitarism. Overall, reported prevalences of severe GH deficiency varied between 2 and 39%. Prevalences were 8–20% using the GHRH–arginine test (cutoff <9 µg/l), 11–39% using the glucagon test (cutoff 1–5 µg/l), 2% using the GHRH test (no cutoff), and 15–18% using the insulin tolerance test (ITT; cutoff <3 µg/l).

Overall, the reported prevalence of secondary adrenal insufficiency had a broad range from 0 to 60%. This prevalence was 0–60% with basal cortisol (cutoff <220 or <440 nmol/l), 7–19% using the ACTH test, and 5% with the ITT as first test (cutoff <500 or <550 nmol/l). Secondary hypothyroidism was present in 0–19% (free thyroxine) or 5–15% (thyroid-releasing hormone stimulation). Secondary hypogonadism was present in 0–29%.

Conclusion: The reported variations in the prevalence rates of hypopituitarism after TBI are in part caused by differences in definitions, endocrine assessments of hypopituitarism, and confounding factors. These methodological issues prohibit simple generalizations of results of original studies on TBI-associated hypopituitarism in the perspective of meta-analyses or reviews.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2010 European Society of Endocrinology.