|
|
||||||||
CLINICAL STUDIES |
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Essen Medical School, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
Center for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Wuppertal, Germany
Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Essen Medical School, Essen, Germany
Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
(Correspondence should be addressed to S Tan Email: susanne.tan{at}uk-essen.de)
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Design: The effect of 6 months of metformin treatment was prospectively assessed in 188 PCOS patients, divided into three groups according to body mass index (BMI; lean: BMI<25 kg/m2, overweight: BMI 25–29 kg/m2, and obese: BMI
30 kg/m2). Outcome parameters, which were also assessed in 102 healthy controls, included body weight, homeostasis model assessment for IR (HOMA-IR), fasting glucose and insulin levels, area under the curve of insulin response (AUCI), hyperandrogenism, and menstrual irregularities.
Results: In comparison with the respective BMI-appropriate control groups, only obese but not lean and overweight PCOS patients showed differences in fasting insulin and HOMA-IR. Metformin therapy significantly improved all outcome parameters except fasting glucose levels. Subgroup analyses revealed that in the group of lean PCOS patients without pre-treatment IR, metformin significantly improved HOMA-IR (1.7±1.0 vs 1.1±0.7 µmol/lxmmol/l2) and fasting insulin levels (7.7±4.2 vs 5.4±3.9 mU/l), in addition to testosterone levels (2.6±0.9 vs 1.8±0.7 nmol/l), anovulation rate (2.3 vs 59.5%), and acne (31.8 vs 11.6%; all P<0.017). In the overweight and obese PCOS groups, metformin also showed the expected beneficial effects.
Conclusion: Metformin improves parameters of IR, hyperandrogenemia, anovulation, and acne in PCOS irrespective of pre-treatment IR or obesity.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since not all PCOS patients are obese or insulin resistant, it is not clear whether PCOS patients without IR also benefit from a therapy with insulin sensitizers. Several smaller studies have suggested positive effects of metformin irrespective of pre-treatment weight and/or presence of IR (Table 1). For example, Goldenberg et al. (31) demonstrated an equal improvement of menstrual irregularities both in insulin-resistant and insulin-sensitive PCOS patients. To further address this important clinical question, the aim of this study was to determine whether metformin treatment improves clinical and biochemical parameters of PCOS irrespective of the presence of obesity and IR prior to treatment.
|
| Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PCOS patients were evaluated at baseline and following treatment with metformin in a weight-adapted dose for 6 months (body weight <60 kg: 500 mg metformin twice a day (BID), 60–100 kg: 850 mg BID, and
100 kg or BMI
30 kg/m2: 1000 mg BID). Outcome parameters included ovulation rate, presence of acne, alopecia, testosterone levels, and hirsutism, in addition to changes in weight as well as in parameters of IR.
Recruitment of participants, inclusion, and exclusion criteria
PCOS patients (n=188) were recruited from the outpatient clinics of the Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, and the Department of Gynecology at the University of Duisburg-Essen. Some patients were also attracted by the clinic's PCOS homepage (www.pco-syndrom.de). PCOS was defined according to the 2003 Rotterdam criteria (5). Age-matched healthy controls (n=102) were recruited from a mandatory screening program for employees instituted at the University of Duisburg-Essen. Exclusion criteria in controls included any known medical condition or disease. In addition, care was taken to exclude all NIH criteria in controls. Specifically, control women were required to have a normal menstrual cycle (i.e. shorter than 35 days), testosterone levels lower than 2.0 nmol/l and/or dehydroepiandrostenedione sulfate (DHEAS) lower than 270 µg/dl and/or androstenedione lower than 3.3 ng/ml, and no hirsutism, acne, or alopecia. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Duisburg-Essen. All participants gave written informed consent before entering the study. All study participants were not taking any medication at least 3 months before entering the study.
Data collection
All women underwent a personal interview with a physician, including an evaluation of demographic characteristics, previous medication, physical examination, and blood sampling. Based on the criteria derived from the 2003 Rotterdam consensus conference (5), diagnosis of PCOS was established when two of the following criteria were present: oligomenorrhea (cycles lasting longer than 35 days) or amenorrhea (less than two menstrual cycles in the past 6 months), clinical or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism (hirsutism) with a Ferriman–Gallwey score (FG) of more than 7 (18) or obvious acne or alopecia (19) or an elevated total testosterone (normal range <2.0 nmol/l) and/or DHEAS (normal range 45–270 µg/dl) and/or androstenedione (normal range 0.2–3.3 ng/ml) and PCO (at least one ovary with at least 12 follicles of a diameter of 2–9 mm or a volume >10 ml), and other pituitary, adrenal, or ovarian diseases could be excluded. Therefore, laboratory analysis of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol, prolactin, cortisol, adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH), thyrotrophin (TSH), insulin-like growth factor, androstenedione, and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate was completed. In addition, an ACTH test with measurement of 17-hydroxyprogesterone was accomplished. When the stimulated value (after 60 min) was >10 ng/ml, a genetic analysis (21-hydroxylase deficiency) was added.
Hirsutism was routinely evaluated independently by two physicians using the common modified FG. This method to assess hirsutism requires the visual scoring of the extent of terminal hairs in nine body areas, named 1) upper lip, 2) chin, 3) chest, 4) upper abdomen, 5) lower abdomen, 6) upper back, 7) lower back, 8) thighs, and 9) upper arms. The lower arms and lower legs were not included in the hair assessment. Each area was scored from 0 to 4, resulting in a possible maximum score of 36. Hirsutism was diagnosed when a score above 7 was evaluated. FG scores never differed by more than 2, and whenever ratings were not identical, the patient was re-evaluated by a third physician and the median value was then used.
Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight/(height)2 in (kg/m2). Parameters of IR and ß-cell function were evaluated using a 3-h oral glucose tolerance test. After an overnight fast of 12 h patients ingested 75 g glucose and had their glucose and insulin levels determined at baseline and at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 min. IR was defined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) model (20, 21) and hyperinsulinemia by calculating the area under the insulin response curve (AUCI) (22). IR in control women was evaluated by fasting glucose, fasting insulin, and the HOMA model.
Biochemical analyses
Automated chemiluminescence immunoassay systems were used for the determination of LH, FSH, ACTH, TSH, testosterone, estradiol, cortisol, free thyroxine, blood glucose (ADVIA Centaur, Bayer Vital, Fernwald, Germany), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, sex hormone-binding globulin, insulin (IMMULITE 2000, DPC Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany), and insulin-like growth factor (Nichols Advantage, Nichols Institute Diagnostics, Bad Vilbel, Germany). 17-Hydroxyprogesterone was measured by the Biosource 17-
-OH-RIA-CT kit (Biosource International, Camarillo, CA, USA; analytical sensitivity 0.02 ng/ml) provided by IBL Hamburg (IBL, Gesellschaft für Immunchemie und Immunbiologie, Hamburg, Germany). Intraassay variation was <5% and interassay variation was <8% for all parameters.
Statistical analyses
PCOS patients and controls were each divided into three subgroups according to BMI (lean: BMI <25 kg/m2, overweight: BMI 25–29 kg/m2, obese: BMI
30 kg/m2). Statistical analyses were completed in three consecutive steps.
levels were corrected for inflation of
error by multiple testing by applying the conservative Bonferroni method, which divides the
level of 0.05 by the number of tests for each variable (in this case given three groups: 0.05/3=0.017). Hence, in evaluating the results of the post hoc comparisons, only comparisons with a P level that was smaller than 0.017 were considered statistically significant.
-corrected post hoc comparisons of means within each weight group. For repeated assessment of frequency distributions given dichotomous variables (e.g. acne, alopecia, menstrual disturbances), no statistical method that is equivalent to the ANOVA exists; therefore, McNemar tests for repeated measurements of dichotomous variables in a sample were applied to address the effects of treatment. The P levels were again corrected here using the Bonferroni method described above.
-correction as described above. For the dichotomous variables,
2 tests were applied. Data are presented as mean±S.D. or as number and percent affected. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the total of N=188 PCOS patients, N=44 were in the lean group (mean BMI: 22.0±1.6), N=42 were in the overweight group (mean BMI: 26.8±1.5), and N=102 were in the obese group (mean BMI: 38.1±6.0) (Table 2). Out of the total of N=102 healthy women, N=66 were in the lean group (mean BMI: 21.5±1.6), N=24 in the overweight group (mean BMI: 26.7±1.4), and N=12 were in the obese group (mean BMI: 34.4±5.1). In comparison with the respective BMI-appropriate control group, lean and overweight PCOS patients showed no differences in fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, and fasting glucose levels. On the other hand, obese PCOS patients had similar fasting glucose but significant higher fasting insulin and HOMA-IR levels compared with obese controls (Table 2). As expected, when compared with controls, all PCOS patient groups demonstrated significantly higher testosterone levels and FG scores.
|
Overall, 6 months of metformin therapy significantly improved all outcome parameters, indicated by significant ANOVA time effects (see Table 3), with the exception of fasting glucose levels. Interestingly, subgroup analyses revealed that in the group of lean PCOS patients without pre-treatment IR (see above), metformin significantly improved HOMA-IR and fasting insulin levels, in addition to testosterone levels, menstrual irregularities, and acne (all P<0.017, see Table 3). In the overweight and obese PCOS groups, metformin also showed the expected beneficial effects, including significant improvements in weight, HOMA-IR, AUCI, fasting insulin as well as testosterone (all P<0.017) (Tables 3 and 4).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since not all PCOS patients are obese or insulin resistant, it has thus far remained unclear whether PCOS patients without evidence of IR would also benefit from a therapy with insulin sensitizers. Indeed, our sample of lean PCOS patients did not differ from lean controls in BMI or levels of fasting insulin and HOMA-IR. Interestingly, in response to metformin treatment, this group of lean PCOS patients clearly showed significant improvements not only in androgen levels, acne, and menstrual irregularities, but also in HOMA-IR, AUC-I, and fasting insulin levels. Hence, even in patients who do not show basal elevation in parameters of IR and present with normal BMI, there is a clear benefit of metformin. This finding is in accordance with several smaller previous studies, which however did not include healthy controls (Table 1). For example, in a Brazilian study with 29 PCOS patients hyperandrogenemia was reduced by treatment with 500 mg three times daily (TID) metformin (29). In addition, lean PCOS patients benefitted from metformin through a reduction of AUCI and fasting insulin. Maciel et al. (29) concluded that lean PCOS patients respond even better to treatment with metformin than obese patients. Kumari et al. (30) demonstrated in a study including 17 lean and 17 obese PCOS patients treated with 1500 mg metformin daily that ovulation and pregnancy rates were higher in the lean PCOS group. These studies are in agreement with our study data, showing a positive effect of metformin therapy on endocrine and metabolic variables even in lean and insulin-sensitive women. Harborne et al. (17) demonstrated a dose-dependent effect of metformin, the divergent effect concerning the outcome of our overweight and obese patients may result from the higher dose applied to our patients. Goldenberg et al. (31) divided their PCOS population into quintiles according to HOMA-IR as a parameter for IR and compared the bottom and top quintile after 1 year of intervention with metformin and diet. They demonstrated an improvement of menstrual cyclicity in the bottom quintile that did not differ from that of the top quintile. Our study confirms the independence from IR of metformin action on menstrual cyclicity in PCOS patients.
Several in vitro studies have revealed some aspects of the mechanisms presumably underlying metformin action. Using cultured ovarian cells from women undergoing bilateral salpingoophorectomy, an inhibition of progesterone and estradiol in granulosa cells and androstenedione in theca cells by metformin has been demonstrated (14). Furthermore, ovarian steroidogenesis in bovine granulosa cells was reportedly inhibited by decreased phosphorylation of MAPK3/MAPK14 by metformin (16). In Wister rats with androgen-induced PCOS, an inhibition of DHEA-induced testosterone concentration by metformin application has also been shown (15). Together, these studies suggest a direct inhibitory effect of metformin on ovarian steroidogenesis.
While the exact mechanism of metformin action is still unclear, it appears that besides reducing IR and thus hyperinsulinemia, metformin has significant effects that are independent from pre-treatment IR.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Mascitelli and F. Pezzetta Does metformin improve polycystic ovary syndrome symptoms through reduction in body iron stores? Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 439 - 439. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |