Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

DOI: 10.1530/EJE-07-0366
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 157, Issue 5, 571-577
Copyright © 2007 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, P.
Right arrow Articles by Verhelst, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, P.
Right arrow Articles by Verhelst, J.
CLINICAL STUDIES

Optimalization and cost management of lanreotide-Autogel therapy in acromegaly

Pascale Abrams, Orsalia Alexopoulou1, Roger Abs, Dominique Maiter1 and Johan Verhelst2

Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 1, B-2650 Antwerp, Belgium
1 Department of Endocrinology, UCL-St Luc Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
2 Department of Endocrinology, Middelheim Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium

(Correspondence should be addressed to P Abrams Email: pascale.abrams{at}uza.be)


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: Lanreotide-Autogel is a depot formulation of the somatostatin analog lanreotide used in the treatment of acromegaly. We investigated whether prolonging or shortening the interval between injections would offer any benefit.

Subjects and methods: The interval was prolonged from once every 4 weeks to once every 6 weeks when patients (n=9) had normal IGF-I and GH concentrations. When patients (n=12) had still elevated IGF-I or GH on the maximal dose of 120 mg every 4 weeks, the interval was shortened to once every 3 weeks. Serum IGF-I and GH were measured after 12 and 24 weeks to allow for dose adaptation. Symptoms and tumor volume were evaluated at baseline and after 36 weeks.

Results: In seven of the nine subjects with normal IGF-I and GH, the interval could be extended to 6 weeks without loosing efficacy on IGF-I (195 vs 213 µg/l; not significant, NS) and GH concentrations (1.4 vs 1.3 µg/l; NS). The weekly dose could significantly be reduced (from 23.3 to 17.8 mg; P=0.002). In only 1 of the 12 not-controlled patients, reducing the interval to once every 3 weeks induced normalization of IGF-I and GH.

Conclusion: In subjects whose acromegaly is well controlled using lanreotide-Autogel, prolonging the time interval between injections can often be increased 4 to 6 weeks without loss of efficacy, thereby improving the subject's comfort and reducing the cost of treatment. On the other hand, in subjects whose acromegaly is not controlled on a dose of 120 mg every 4 weeks, reducing the interval to every 3 weeks is rarely beneficial.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with significant morbidity and mortality (1). The main goal of therapy is to normalize, or at least adequately control, both biochemical disease markers, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and growth hormone (GH), allowing reversal of the mortality rate into the range of the general population. Although neurosurgery is still considered the first-line treatment for acromegaly, the cure rate in the best surgical series is estimated to be not higher than 80–90% for microadenomas and 30–50% for macroadenomas (2, 3). Therefore, adjuvant therapy is frequently necessary to achieve optimal IGF-I and GH control (1). External radiotherapy usually prevents tumor growth and reduces IGF-I and GH levels, but the slow onsetof action, the high incidence of hypopituitarism, and the cerebrovascular complications have minimized its role (4–6). Recent advances in the development of pharmacologic agents have permitted more efficacious medical treatment of persistent acromegaly, and these agents are also emerging as compelling options for primary therapy in selected patients (7). However, due to its long-term requirement, medical therapy has an elevated financial burden, compared with uneventful surgery or radiotherapy. Cabergoline, a long-acting dopamine agonist, appears to have a particular benefit in acromegalic patients with moderate disease activity or a tumor co-secreting prolactin (8, 9). Long-acting somatostatin analogs, such as octreotide and lanreotide, exhibiting a high affinity for somatostatin analog long acting (SSTR)-2, have been shown to be effective, normalizing serum IGF-I levels in up to 60% of unselected cases (10–16). The GH receptor antagonist, pegvisomant, is presently the most effective medical treatment, normalizing IGF-I secretion in about 90% of cases (17). Restraints for this treatment are the need of frequent injections and the high cost, specially if reimbursement is not provided by the social security. The limitations of the medical therapies have led investigators to develop combined drug modalities (18, 19) and to look for somatostatin analogs with improved SSTR-5 binding or with binding to the dopamine receptor (20, 21).

In this study, we first investigated whether cost reduction of somatostatin analog treatment could be achieved by prolonging the time interval between injections without loss of efficacy in patients whose acromegaly is adequately controlled by lanreotide-Autogel. Secondly, we considered the possibility of enhancing the efficacy of lanreotide-Autogel by increasing the dose. For these purposes, the dose of lanreotide-Autogel was adapted to optimize the treatment and to reduce the cost in a group of 21 acromegalic patients already receiving a 4-weekly dose of this medication for a period of 24 weeks.


   Subjects and methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subjects and study protocol

Of the 25 subjects with active acromegaly reported in a previous study comparing the efficacy of octreotide-LAR and lanreotide-Autogel (16), 21 were included in this prospective, open, multicenter, within-subject controlled extension study. All subjects had been treated during the 12 previous weeks with lanreotide-Autogel at a fixed 4 weekly dose of 60 mg (n=3), 90 mg (n=3), or 120 mg (n=15). The dose titration in this study depended upon the measurements of age- and gender-adjusted IGF-I values and the mean of three consecutive GH determinations taken at 30-min intervals. At the start of this study, a first dose adaptation was carried out. The time interval between two injections was increased to 6 weeks in patients whose acromegaly is well controlled overall (arbitrarily defined by a normal IGF-I and a mean GH<1.7 µg/l). In patients with overall poor control (IGF-I above normal and GH>2.5 µg/l), the starting dose was increased by 30 mg to a maximum of 120 mg every 4 weeks or the time interval was decreased to 3 weeks in patients in whom the 120 mg dosage was already used. In case of ‘reasonably good’ control (IGF-I normal and mean GH>1.7 and <2.5 µg/l), the time interval was increased to 6 weeks and the dose was simultaneously increased by 30 mg, resulting in a comparable weekly dose. After periods of 12 and 24 weeks from baseline, a further dose adaptation was done in cases of poor control, by increasing the dose or by decreasing the time between injections.

The analysis at the end of the study was performed by taking into account the efficacy of the final dose of lanreotide-Autogel. For the purpose of comparison, the dose is reported in milligrams per week regardless of the frequency of administration. The subjects were separated into two groups: group A consisted of nine subjects receiving a final dose of lanreotide-Autogel ≤30 mg per week (classical dose group) and group B consisted of 12 subjects in whom the dose of lanreotide-Autogel had to be increased to 40 mg per week because of inadequate IGF-I and GH control with a classical dose. In each group, we compared the IGF-I and GH values and the doses of lanreotide-Autogel used at the start of the study (baseline) and at 36 weeks (final). Characteristics of both groups are given in Table 1. Only small differences between both groups were observed regarding gender distribution, age, BMI, blood pressure, duration of acromegaly, tumor size, and glycemic control (not significant, NS). At the time of diagnosis, 20 patients had a macroadenoma and one patient (in group A) had a microadenoma. Neurosurgery was significantly more often a primary treatment of choice in the not-controlled group B, while prolonged somatostatin analog treatment was significantly more favored in the controlled group A (P<0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1 Clinical and biochemical characteristics of acromegalic patients grouped according to response to lanreotide-Autogel at baseline and after dose adaptation.

 
The protocol was approved by the local ethics committees of each study center, and all subjects gave written informed consent.

GH and IGF-I measurements

All fasting IGF-I and GH measurements were performed centrally by automated, two-site chemiluminescence immunoassays (Nichols Advantage IGF-I Assay and Nichols Advantage HGH Assay, Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA).

The sensitivity of the IGF-I assay was 6 µg/l and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 5.2 and 5.7% respectively. The age-related normal serum IGF-I concentrations were 125–379 µg/l (25–30 years), 114–316 µg/l (30–35 years), 108–301 µg/l (35–40 years), 101–279 µg/l (40–50 years), 92–253 µg/l (50–60 years), and 83–230 µg/l (60–80 years).

The calculated sensitivity of the GH assay was 0.1 µg/l and the intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 4.8 and 5.8% respectively. GH values were expressed in terms of the first WHO International Standard (IS) 80/505 for rDNA GH, in use at the time of the assay (conversion factor for expression in terms of the second WHO IS 98/574 provided by Nichols=GH concentrationx0.56).

Most studies in treated acromegalics are using a 2.5 ng/ml threshold as a ‘safe’ GH level but emerging evidence exists that this limit might be too high and should be decreased to 2.0 ng/ml or even lower. We arbitrarily chose 1.7 ng/ml as strict cutoff value of good control. In contrast, a GH value above 2.5 µg/l was considered as indicative of poor control.

Symptoms of acromegaly

Five signs or symptoms of active acromegaly (headache, perspiration, asthenia, swelling of extremities, and joint pain) were self-evaluated by the subject using a four-point rating scale (absent=0, mild=1, moderate=2, and severe=3). A comparison between the symptomatology at the start and end of the study is reported.

Cost of treatment

The cost of one injection of lanreotide-Autogel in Belgium is {euro} 943 for 60 mg, {euro} 1128 for 90 mg, and {euro} 1380 for 120 mg.

Safety

General adverse side effects of lanreotide-Autogel (nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea) and local symptoms at the injection site (pain, erythema, and swelling) were recorded throughout the study. Symptoms were classified using a four-point rating scale (none=0, mild=1, moderate=2, and severe=3), and results were compared between the start and end of the study.

Ultrasound examination of the gallbladder was performed at the start and end of the study.

Pituitary imaging was performed at the start and end of the study, whenever residual tissue was present. The volume of the tumor was calculated using the mathematical formula of a rotating ellipsoid (34). Changes in tumor size between the start and end of the study were defined as absent (<25%), moderate (between 25 and 50%), or marked (more than 50% reduction or increase).

Statistical analysis

Continuous, normally distributed variables were analyzed using an ANOVA model to compare in the same subject final values recorded at the start and end of the study. For continuous variables which even after log transformation grossly violated the normality assumptions for ANOVA, the Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was performed on the recorded differences between the start and end of the study.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Baseline characteristics of groups A and B

As could be assumed from the subdivision, the two groups showed significantly distinct characteristics regarding the weekly dose of lanreotide-Autogel (17.8±7.9 vs 40, P<0.0001) and its therapeutic efficacy on IGF-I (213±31 vs 479±220 µg/l respectively, P<0.002). The clinical signs of acromegaly were more pronounced in the not-controlled group, although not in a significant manner. Lanreotide-Autogel was well tolerated since general and local side effects were scarce in both groups (Table 1).

Dose adaptation in group A (disease control-classical dose)

The dose of lanreotide-Autogel could be decreased from 60 mg four-weekly to 60 mg six-weekly in three subjects (A3, A5, and A8), from 90 mg four-weekly to 90 mg six-weekly in two subjects (A7 and A9), and from 120 mg four-weekly to 120 mg six-weekly in two subjects (A2 and A6). In two other subjects (A1 and A4), the dose of 120 mg four-weekly had to be maintained.

The calculated weekly dose of lanreotide-Autogel could be significantly decreased from 23.3±7.0 to 17.8±7.9 mg (P=0.002). This had no significant impact on IGF-I concentration (195±68 vs 213±31 µg/l before and after dose adaptation respectively; NS), nor on mean GH concentration (1.4±1.6 vs 1.3±0.8; NS).

The individual doses of lanreotide-Autogel and the IGF-I and GH responses are shown in the left panels of Figs 1 and 2 (IGF-I and GH respectively).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 1 Serum IGF-I concentrations in acromegalic subjects responding to a dose of lanreotide-Autogel equal or <30 mg (left panel) and the subjects requiring a dose of 40 mg (right panel). The open squares correspond to the baseline values and the closed squares to the final values after changing of dose or time gap between injections. The numbers next to the squares indicate the weekly dose of lanreotide-Autogel. The shaded zones depict the age-adapted normal IGF-I concentrations.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Figure 2 Serum GH concentrations in acromegalic subjects responding to a dose of lanreotide-Autogel ≤30 mg (left panel) and the subjects requiring a dose of 40 mg (right panel). The open squares correspond to the baseline values and the closed squares to the final values after changing of dose or time gap between injections. The numbers next to the squares indicate the weekly dose of lanreotide-Autogel. The shaded zones depict the safe GH concentration below 1.7 µg/l (dark grey) or 2.5 µg/l (light grey).

 
Nine subjects were ultimately controlled for IGF-I and GH concentrations with a weekly dose of lanreotide-Autogel equal or <30 mg. All nine subjects had already a normal IGF-I and seven had a safe GH value at baseline. One of the subjects with a slightly elevated GH concentration (A4) showed normalization without increasing the dose lanreotide-Autogel, while the dose could even be decreased in another one (A6). Overall, the weekly dose could be diminished in seven of nine subjects by prolonging the time interval between injections to 6 weeks without deteriorating the biochemical control of acromegaly.

Plasma glucose and HbA1c were not different from baseline (Table 1). The clinical signs of active acromegaly decreased from 2.2±2.2 at baseline to 1.0±1.0 at the end of the trial (NS). No significant changes in general or local side effects occurred during the study, except for a major local irritation in one subject. The number of subjects with gallstones increased from four to five. Pituitary imaging performed in seven subjects showed a moderate decrease in tumor volume in one and no changes in the remainder.

On a yearly basis, for seven of the nine subjects in whom the dose could be decreased the cost diminished by almost 34 000 {euro} from 137 865 {euro} to 103 870 {euro}.

Dose adaptation in group B (no disease control – high dose)

The weekly dose of lanreotide-Autogel, which was adapted in all subjects (B1–12), increased significantly from 30 to 40 mg (P<0.001). Despite this adaptation, further, although not-significant increases, in IGF-I (444±220 vs 479±220 µg/l) and GH concentrations (4.1±2.6 vs 5.0±4.7 µg/l) were observed.

The individual doses of lanreotide-Autogel and the IGF-I and GH responses are shown in the right panels of Figs 1 and 2 (IGF-I and GH respectively).

Increase of the lanreotide-Autogel dose to 40 mg per week resulted in a normalization of both IGF-I and GH in only one subject (B9). One subject (B4) normalized GH levels without normalization of IGF-I. One subject (B11) with normal IGF-I before and after dose adaptation still maintained elevated GH levels despite this adaptation. One subject (B10) with safe GH before and after dose adaptation still maintained elevated IGF-I levels despite this adaptation. IGF-I control was lost in one subject (B3) and GH control in another one (B12). In the remaining six subjects, normalization of IGF-I or GH did not occur.

Plasma glucose and HbA1c were not different from baseline. The clinical signs of active acromegaly increased from 2.8±2.6 at baseline to 3.6±3.1 at the end of the trial (NS). No major changes in general and local side effects occurred. The number of subjects with gallstones increased from five to six. Pituitary imaging performed in seven subjects showed a moderate reduction in volume in two and an increase moderate in another two.

The yearly cost for the 12 subjects in this study receiving a 4-weekly dose of 120 mg lanreotide-Autogel would increase by {euro} 71 760 from {euro} 215 280 to {euro} 287 040 if the dose were given 3-weekly, however it was only beneficial for one subject.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Somatostatin analogs such as octreotide and lanreotide are acceptable therapeutic options in acromegaly since they are known to normalize IGF-I and GH levels in 40–60% and to induce some tumor shrinkage in 30% of subjects (10, 11). These drugs are available in depot preparations in different dosages, 20–30 mg for octreotide-LAR and 60–90–120 mg for lanreotide-Autogel. The interval between injections is usually kept constant at 4 weeks. It is generally advised to regularly adjust the dose upon the serum IGF-I and GH levels in order to obtain the best effect on disease activity at the lowest price. We arbitrarily chose 1.7 ng/ml as strict cutoff value of control of disease because several retrospective studies have reported that a GH value of 2 µg/l or even lower is an appropriate therapeutic target, as values above this level are associated with increased mortality (31).

In the present study, which was an extension of a comparison study between octreotide-LAR and lanreotide-Autogel (16), we investigated whether changes in the interval between lanreotide-Autogel injections in addition to changes in the dose would offer any benefit in terms of clinical and biochemical control, subject's comfort, and cost of therapy. We could first demonstrate that in 78% of subjects, well controlled by the classical dose of 30 mg/week or less (good responders), the interval between injections of lanreotide-Autogel could be extended to 6 weeks instead of 4 weeks without significant loss in disease control. In addition, the total dose of medication could be significantly reduced from 23.3 to 17.8 mg/week. But even when the total weekly dose remains unchanged, prolonging the interval between injections can improve patient comfort and reduce costs. For instance, changing to dose lanreotide-Autogel from 60 mg every 4 weeks to 90 mg every 6 weeks results in a decrease of the yearly number of injections from 12 to 8 and in a reduction of the yearly cost from 11 316 {euro} to 9024 {euro}, due to the lower relative price of the 90 mg dosage.

The possibility of extending the interval between injections of somatostatin analogs was also reported in studies with lanreotide prolonged release, another depot form of lanreotide which is released gradually over 7–14 days after injection via biodegradable microparticles. In one study, it was shown that 27% of patients with acromegaly still had safe GH levels 3 weeks after their last injection, suggesting that the interval may be increased from once every 1 or 2 weeks to once every 3 weeks when subjects initially respond well (22). In another study, the interval between injections could even be increased to once every 4 weeks in lanreotide-sensitive subjects, without altering the efficacy upon IGF-I and GH secretion (23). More recently, a large number of acromegalic subjects switched from lanreotide prolonged release to lanreotide-Autogel could remain well controlled with injections every 6 or even 8 weeks, at the condition that they were well controlled by lanreotide prolonged release every 10–14 days (24). The possibility of extending the interval between injections from once every 4 to once every 6 weeks or even longer without loosing efficacy has also been reported with octreotide-LAR (22, 25, 26). After a total of 12 months of treatment with lanreotide-Autogel, a true steady state was still not clearly obtained in some of our patients. Several studies have shown indeed that serum GH and IGF-I levels may continue to progressively decline during long-term treatment with somatostatin analogs (32, 33).

The reasons why IGF-I and GH levels remain under control after prolonging the interval are probably twofold. First, in a pharmacodynamic study in 24 healthy volunteers, significant levels of lanreotide could still be found at day 56, indicating continued drug activity beyond 4 weeks (27). Secondly, IGF-I and GH levels once adequately suppressed with somatostatin analogs may need 4–12 weeks before starting to rise again (28).

In the second part of the present study, we examined whether shortening the dose interval of lanreotide-Autogel would offer any advantage in terms of control of IGF-I and GH levels in subjects not controlled by the classical dose of 120 mg 4-weekly. Despite increasing the weekly dose from 30 to 40 mg, only one of the subjects (8%) experienced any benefit from reducing the interval between injections to 3 weeks. The clinical experience with high-dose somatostatin analogs remains limited, but, similarly to lanreotide-Autogel, a poor therapeutic response with octreotide-LAR has been observed. Seven acromegalic subjects, included in a series of 36 treated by octreotide-LAR, received a monthly dose of 40 mg, but only one achieved a normalization of IGF-I and a safe GH concentration (29). These findings concur with the concept that partial or complete resistance of somatotrope adenomas to somatostatin analogs is usually not related to inadequate dosing but rather to a deficient number or insensitive type of receptors on the cell membrane (30).

In conclusion, this open multicenter study shows that in well-controlled subjects prolonging the time interval between two injections of lanreotide-Autogel from 4 to 6 weeks can be done in a majority of subjects without loosing efficacy, thereby improving their comfort and reducing the cost of treatment. On the other hand, in not-controlled subjects on the maximal dose of 120 mg 4-weekly, a further increase of the dose will rarely improve the biochemical control.


   Acknowledgements
 
The authors wish to thank the Ipsen Company for generously supplying lanreotide-Autogel.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    1. AACE Guidelines American association of clinical endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly Endocrine Practice 10 2004 214–225.

    2. Melmed S. AcromegalyEds.S Melmed. The Pituitary 2 (ch. 11) 2002 Blackwell Science Inc Massachusetts 419–454.

    3. Stewart PM. Current therapy for acromegaly. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 11 128–132.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    4. Monson JP. Is there still a role for radiotherapy in acromegaly?. Neuroendocrinology 2006 83 269–273.[ISI][Medline]

    5. Powell JS, Wardlaw SL, Post KD & Freda PU. Outcome of radiotherapy for acromegaly using normalization of insulin-like growth factor I to define cure. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2000 85 2068–2071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    6. Epaminonda P, Porretti S, Cappiello V, Beck-Peccoz P, Faglia G & Arosio M. Efficacy of radiotherapy in normalizing serum IGF-I, acid-labile subunit (ALS) and IGFBP-3 levels in acromegaly. Clinical Endocrinology 2001 55 183–189.[CrossRef][Medline]

    7. Muller AF & van der Lely AJ. Pharmacological therapy for acromegaly. A critical review. Drugs 2004 16 1817–1838.

    8. Biller BMK, Molitch ME, Vance ML, Baker Cannistrato K, Davis KR, Simons JA, Schoenfelder JR & Klibanski A. Treatment of prolactin-secreting macroadenoma with the once-weekly dopamine agonist cabergoline. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1996 81 2338–2343.[Abstract]

    9. Abs R, Verhelst J, Maiter D, Van Acker K, Nobels F, Coolens JL, Mahler C & Beckers A. Cabergoline in the treatment of acromegaly: a study in 64 patients. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 374–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    10. Freda PU, Katznelson L, van der Lely AJ, Reyes CM, Zhao S & Rabinowitz D. Long-acting somatostatin analog therapy of acromegaly: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2005 90 4465–4473.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    11. Verhelst JA, Pedroncelli AM, Abs R, Montini M, Vandeweghe MV, Albani G, Maiter D, Pagani MD, Legros JJ, Gianola D, Bex M, Poppe K, Mockel J & Pagani G. Slow release lanreotide in the treatment of acromegaly: a study of 66 patients. European Journal of Endocrinology 2000 143 577–584.[Abstract]

    12. Stewart PM, Kane KF, Stewart SE, Lancranjan I & Sheppard MC. Depot long-acting somatostatin analog (Sandostatin-LAR) is an effective treatment for acromegaly. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1995 80 3267–3272.[Abstract]

    13. Giusti M, Gussoni G, Cuttica CM & Giordano G. Effectiveness and tolerability of slow release lanreotide treatment in active acromegaly: six-month report on an Italian multicenter study. Italian Multicenter Slow Release Lanreotide Study Group. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1996 81 2089–2097.[Abstract]

    14. Caron P, Morange-Ramos I, Cogne M & Jaquet P. Three year follow-up of acromegalic patients treated with intramuscular slow-release lanreotide. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1997 82 18–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    15. Lancranjan I & Atkinson AB. Results of a European multicentre study with Sandostatin LAR in acromegalic patients. Sandostatin LAR Group. Pituitary 1999 1 105–114.[CrossRef][Medline]

    16. Alexopoulou O, Abrams P, Verhelst J, Poppe K, Velkeniers B, Abs R & Maiter D. Efficacy and tolerability of lanreotide autogel therapy in acromegalic patients previously treated with octreotide LAR. European Journal of Endocrinology 2005 151 317–324.[ISI]

    17. van der Lely AJ, Hutson RK, Trainer PJ, Besser GM, Barkan AL, Katznelson L, Klibanski A, Herman-Bonert V, Melmed S, Vance ML, Freda PU, Stewart PM, Friend KE, Clemmons DR, Johannsson G, Stavrou S, Cook DM, Phillips LS, Strasburger CJ, Hackett S, Zib KA, Davis RJ, Scarlett JA & Thorner MO. Long-term treatment of acromegaly with pegvisomant, a growth hormone receptor antagonist. Lancet 2001 358 1754–1759.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    18. Selvarajah D, Webster J, Ross R & Newell-Price J. Effectiveness of adding dopamine agonist therapy to long-acting somatostatin analogues in the management of acromegaly. European Journal of Endocrinology 2005 152 569–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    19. Feenstra J, de Herder WW, ten Have SM, van den Beld AW, Feelders RA, Janssen JA & van der Lely AJ. Combined therapy with somatostatin analogues and weekly pegvisomant in active acromegaly. Lancet 2005 13 1644–1646.

    20. van der Hoek J, de Herder WW, Feelders RA, van der Lely AJ, Uitterlinden P, Boerlin V, Bruns C, Poon KW, Lewis I, Weckbecker G, Krahnke T, Hofland LJ & Lamberts SW. A single-dose comparison of the acute effects between the new somatostatin analog SOM230 and octreotide in acromegalic patients. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2004 89 638–645.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    21. Jaquet P, Gunz G, Saveanu A, Dufour H, Taylor J, Dong J, Kim S, Moreau JP, Enjalbert A & Culler MD. Efficacy of chimeric molecules directed towards multiple somatostatin and dopamine receptors on inhibition of GH and prolactin secretion from GH-secreting pituitary adenomas classified as partially responsive to somatostatin analog therapy. European Journal of Endocrinology 2005 153 135–141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    22. Jenkins PJ, Akker S, Chew SL, Besser GM, Monson JP & Grossman AB. Optimal dosage interval for depot somatostatin analogue therapy in acromegaly requires individual titration. Clinical Endocrinology 2000 53 719–724.[CrossRef][Medline]

    23. Caron P, Tabarin A, Cogne M, Chanson P & Jaquet P. Variable growth hormone profiles following withdrawal of long-term 30 mg slow-release lanreotide treatment in acromegalic patients: clinical implications. European Journal of Endocrinology 2000 142 565–571.[Abstract]

    24. Lucas T & Astorga R. Spanish–Portuguese Multicentre Autogel Study Group on acromegaly. Efficacy of lanreotide Autogel administered every 4–8 weeks in patients with acromegaly previously responsive to lanreotide microparticles 30 mg: a phase III trial. Clinical Endocrinology 2006 65 320–326.[Medline]

    25. Biermasz NR, van den Oever NC, Frolich M, Arias AM, Smit JW, Romijn JA & Roelfsema F. Sandostatin LAR in acromegaly: a 6-week injection interval suppresses GH secretion as effectively as a 4-week interval. Clinical Endocrinology 2003 58 288–295.[Medline]

    26. Turner HE, Thornton-Jones VA & Wass JA. Systematic dose-extension of octreotide LAR: the importance of individual tailoring of treatment in patients with acromegaly. Clinical Endocrinology 2004 61 224–231.[Medline]

    27. Antonijoan RM, Barbanoj MJ, Cordero JA, Peraire C, Obach R, Valles J, Cherif-Cheikh R, Torres ML, Bismuth F & Montes M. Pharmacokinetics of a new Autogel formulation of the somatostatin analogue lanreotide after a single subcutaneous dose in healthy volunteers. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2004 56 471–476.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    28. Stewart PM, Stewart SE, Clark PM & Sheppard MC. Clinical and biochemical response following withdrawal of a long-acting, depot injection form of octreotide (Sandostatin-LAR). Clinical Endocrinology 1999 50 295–299.[CrossRef][Medline]

    29. Colao A & Ferone D. Long-term effects of depot long-acting somatostatin analog octreotide on hormone levels and tumor mass in acromegaly. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 2779–2786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    30. Bronstein MD. Acromegaly: molecular expression of somatostatin receptors subtypes and treatment outcome. Frontiers of Hormone Research 2006 35 129–134.[ISI][Medline]

    31. Sheppard MC. GH and mortality in acromegaly. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 2005 28 75–77.[Medline]

    32. Jallad RS, Musolino NR, Salgado LR & Bronstein MD. Treatment of acromegaly with octreotide -LAR extensive experience in a Brzilian institution. Clinical Endocrinology 2005 63 168–175.[Medline]

    33. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Cappabianca P, Cirillo S, Boerlin V, Lancranjan I & Lombardi G. Long-term effects of depot long-acting somatostatin analog octreotide on hormone levels and tumor mass in acromegaly. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2001 86 2779–2786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    34. Di Chiro G & Nelson KB. The volume of the sella turcica. American Journal of Radiology 1962 87 989–1008.

Received 13 August 2007
Accepted 3 September 2007




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. D. Murray and S. Melmed
A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 2957 - 2968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, P.
Right arrow Articles by Verhelst, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abrams, P.
Right arrow Articles by Verhelst, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS