Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.01940
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 153, Issue 1, 49-55
Copyright © 2005 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Görges, R
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, O E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Görges, R
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, O E

CLINICAL STUDY

Development and clinical impact of thyroglobulin antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma during the first 3 years after thyroidectomy

R Görges, M Maniecki, W Jentzen, Sie n-Yi Sheu1, K Mann2, A Bockisch and O E Janssen2

Department of Nuclear Medicine, 1 Institute of Pathology and 2 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45 122 Essen, Germany

(Correspondence should be addressed to R Görges; Email: rainer.goerges{at}uni-essen.de)


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Objective and design: Cross-sectional studies have reported an increased prevalence of circulating thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAbs) in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). With the advent of more sensitive assays, a longitudinal study monitoring the development of TgAb levels after ablative therapy was warranted.

Methods: One hundred and twelve consecutive patients with follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer were followed for 3 years. All patients had been thyroidectomized and received, on average, two radioiodine therapies. Residual tissue was quantified scintigraphically by 131I 24-h uptake. TgAb and thyroglobulin (Tg) serum levels were determined with a sensitive direct radioligand assay and an IRMA respectively.

Results: The prevalence of TgAbs at the initial examination was 29% (median 130 U/ml). During follow-up, TgAb levels rose transiently in one-tenth of the patients, but the prevalence of demonstrable TgAbs decreased to <10% after 3 years. The median serum half-life of TgAbs in treated DTC patients was 10 weeks. At initial examination (when all patients still had residual thyroid tissue and 17 had metastases), rising TgAb levels were correlated with the inability to detect Tg in 4, 30 and 73% of the patients, when initial TgAbs were <6, 6–50 or >50 U/ml respectively. While the Tg recovery test was valid for all patients, an in vitro dilution assay with TgAb serum reduced Tg values by up to 32%.

Conclusions: The development and course of TgAbs in DTC patients cannot be predicted by initial or residual tumour volume, TgAb or Tg levels. The presence of TgAbs, even in low concentrations, may cause Tg underestimation despite valid recovery tests in DTC patients.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Thyroglobulin (Tg) measurement is the mainstay for the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC). As thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAbs) are more prevalent in thyroid cancer patients than in the general population (1) and may interfere with Tg determinations, even at low serum levels detected only by sensitive assays (2), the interaction of TgAb with Tg could result in inadequate further diagnostics and treatment of residual or relapsing DTC (3). However, there is no general consensus as to whether the measurement of TgAbs is meaningful for the evaluation of possible interference with Tg measurement, or whether TgAb measurement complements the Tg recovery test (2, 46). On the other hand, TgAbs have been proposed as an alternative tumour marker by some authors, but contested by others (712). In this prospective study, we report the initial prevalence and course of TgAbs in 112 consecutive DTC patients 3 years after thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation to evaluate possible interferences with Tg measurement, other confounding factors and their implication for further follow-up. As a model to demonstrate the lowering of Tg values by TgAb, their interference was also evaluated in vitro.


    Materials and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients and clinical procedures

A prospective longitudinal study was performed in 112 consecutive DTC patients (31 males, 81 females; age at the initial examination 17–78 years, median 50 years) who were examined for the first time from June 2000 to August 2001 in our Clinic of Nuclear Medicine and were further treated and regularly followed-up. At each visit, TgAbs were determined unless they had been negative in the last two visits over a maximum time-period of 167 weeks, resulting in a total of 560 serum samples with three to eight samples per patient. Clinical data available from the further follow-up were included in the evaluation, the entire mean follow-up since initial diagnosis was 33 ± 8 months (means ± S.D.). The initial examination of the patients took place under thyroid hormone withdrawal in planning the first radioiodine therapy and included a radioiodine scintigraphy of the neck with determination of the 24-h uptake reflecting the amount of remnant thyroid tissue. Prior to ablative radioiodine therapy, thyroid remnants were found in all patients: the 131I 24-h uptake ranged from 1.0 to 33.5% (median 4.0%). Reports from the histological examination – including possible alterations of the non-tumoral thyroid tissue – were available for all patients. All patients had thyroidectomy and, if necessary, cervical lymph node dissection in either one intervention (25 patients) or two interventions (87 patients). Histology revealed papillary carcinoma in 76 cases, follicular carcinoma in 34 cases and poorly differentiated (insular) carcinoma in two cases. The median time-period between last surgery and initial examination was 23 days. Subsequently, the patients received radioiodine therapy, under endogenous thyrotrophin (TSH) stimulation. Radioiodine therapy was repeated in cases of persistent radioiodine accumulation and detectable Tg at average 4-monthly intervals until no further effect was demonstrated (six patients received one therapy, 86 patients two therapies, 17 patients three therapies and three patients four therapies with activities ranging from 1 to 6 GBq 131I for the first and from 4 to 10 GBq for further therapies). One year after the final radioiodine therapy, whole body scans were acquired with 0.4 or 1 GBq 131I.

Apart from the preparation for radioiodine therapies or whole-body diagnostics, the patients were treated with suppressive doses of levothyroxine. After the final radioiodine therapy, patients were followed up at 6-monthly intervals. Work-up included ultrasonography of the neck and measurements of Tg, TgAbs, TSH, free thyroxine and free tri-iodothyronine. Further imaging modalities (X-ray, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, skeletal scintigraphy and positron emission tomography) were applied as required.

Laboratory measurements

TgAbs were determined with a direct, non-competitive two-step radioligand assay (CentAK anti-Tg; Medipan Diagnostica, Selchow, Germany) calibrated against the international reference preparation NIBSC 65/93 with a factor of two (a TgAb value measured with the CentAK assay is twice as high as the original reference material). The functional sensitivity (referring to the 10% intra-and 20% interassay coefficients of variation) was in the range of 15U/ml, while the lowest standard of the assay was 6 U/ml. For this study, the analytical sensitivity, similiar to the lowest standard in this assay, was used as the lower cut-off. The value of 50U/ml, which has been established for patients with benign thyroidal autoimmune diseases, was used as the upper cut-off level. Tg was measured by an immunoradiometric sandwich assay using two monoclonal antibodies against different epitopes of the molecule (SelCO Tg; Medipan Diagnostica). The functional sensitivity of this assay was 0.5 ng/ml and the lowest standard 0.3 ng/ml. Tg measurements were routinely performed as duplicates and included a recovery test for every sample. Following the manufacturer’s recommendations, patients sera were spiked with 50 ng Tg/ml and recovery calculated as: ((Tg (patient’s serum + recovery buffer) – Tg (patient’s serum))/Tg (Tg-free serum + recovery buffer)) x 100%. Recoveries between 70 and 130% were considered as valid. Possible in vitro interferences of TgAbs on the Tg measurement were investigated by serum dilution experiments with sera from DTC patients who all had proven metastases. Four different sera with Tg values ranging from 14.0 to 190 ng/ml and negative TgAbs were each diluted 1 + 1 with three sera with extremely high TgAbs (>1000 U/ml) but non-measurable Tg. The diluted sera were incubated for 4 h at room temperature for Tg determinations. Tg values from the mixtures were compared with the values from 1 + 1 dilutions with TgAb- and Tg-negative control serum.

Statistics

Statistical differences were evaluated with two-tailed Kruskal–Wallis H test, Mann–Whitney U test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. P values <0.05 were considered significant. Kinetics of the TgAb decrease were calculated by least square analysis of semilogarithmic plots of remaining TgAb levels vs time.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient characteristics at initial examination

TgAbs at the time of the initial examination (median 23 days after the last surgery) were demonstrable in 32 (29%) of all patients (range 7–1531 U/ml, median 130 U/ml). All these 32 patients had valid recovery tests (89–121%). In 22 of our 112 patients (20%), the initially measured TgAb concentrations even exceeded the value of 50 U/ml ( = cut-off for healthy subjects without thyroid disease). Separated by gender, TgAbs were found in two (6%) of all males (19 and 21 U/ml respectively) and in 30 (37%) of all females (range 7–1531 U/ml, median 136 U/ml); the difference in prevalence between men und women was highly significant (P = 0.001) and remained significant even when the different age distribution was taken into consideration. Subgroup analysis of patients with proven metastases (n = 17; six males and 11 females, median Tg 13 ng/ml), and those having only thyroid remnants (n = 95; 25 males and 70 females, median Tg 1.9 ng/ml) revealed TgAbs only in one case (6%) from the former group, whereas TgAbs were demonstrable in 31 patients (32%) from the latter group. Hence, patients with metastases did not have a higher prevalence of circulating TgAbs than patients who only had thyroid remnants at the first examination. No significant differences were found between both groups concerning 131I 24-h uptake (median 5 vs 4%) and TSH level (median 40 vs 53 mU/l). To analyze the relationship between measurable Tg values under TSH stimulation and the presence of TgAbs at initial examination, patients were classified into ‘TgAb negative’ (<6 U/ml; n = 80) and ‘TgAb positive’ (>6 U/ml; n = 32). The latter were further subdivided into patients with TgAbs 7–50 U/ml (n = 10) and those with TgAbs >50 U/ml (n = 22). The mean Tg levels as well as the percentage of patients with Tg values above the detection limit were significantly lower in the groups with demonstrable TgAbs, with a further decrease with higher TgAb levels (Table 1Go). In contrast, the results of the recovery test, the amount of remnant thyroid tissue as reflected by 131I uptake and the extent of TSH stimulation did not differ significantly between the groups. In order to screen for pre-existing autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), histology reports from all our patients with initial TgAb values >40 U/ml (n = 23) were re-evaluated. Diffuse lymphocytic infiltration in the non-tumoral thyroid tissue, compatible with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, was described in ten out of 23 patients. Cases with peritumoral focal lymphocytic infiltrations were excluded, as this is a common finding independent from pre-existing AITD. Together with two more patients in whom Graves’ disease had been established previously, half of the 23 DTC patients had pre-existing AIDT. While there is a bias in that these patients were more likely to be evaluated for AITD, at least 11% (12 out of 112) of our DTC patient group had pre-existing AITD. There was no correlation of lymphocytic infiltration with any tumour histology.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Relationship between circulating TgAbs and measurable Tg values, corresponding TSH and amount of thyroid remnant tissue (reflected by the 131I 24-h uptake) at the initial examination (prior to radioiodine therapy).
 
Dynamics of TgAb changes

The second examination could be performed in 42 outpatients after a relative short time-period (5–14 weeks; median 8 weeks) subsequent to the first radioiodine therapy. At that time, an increase in TgAbs was observed in three (7%) of them (of whom one had been TgAb negative at the first examination, whereas the remaining 28 initially TgAb-negative patients stayed negative). In seven (54%) of the 13 out of 42 patients who had been TgAb positive at the initial examination, TgAbs had already begun to decrease, and in the remaining four TgAb-positive patients the values showed no significant changes. Later, we observed a rise in TgAbs in four additional patients (of whom two had been TgAb negative at the first examination); the respective TgAb peak values were measured 4–8 months after the initial examination. Only one of the overall seven patients with an initial TgAb increase had (disseminated pulmonary) metastases, the remaining six never had active tumour disease during the whole observation period. In the early follow-up period, three patients who were initially TgAb negative became TgAb positive, with no further patients converting later. Including those three initially TgAb-negative patients who converted to positive, 35 of the entire 112 patients (31%) had at least intermittent measurable TgAbs within the initial 3 years following surgery and radioiodine therapy. Subsequent to their respective peak, TgAbs began to decrease continuously in most patients (some times after a latency period of various durations), whereas the finding that values remain measurable at a low level over years was not infrequent. In only two patients (both had papillary carcinoma T2N0M0 without demonstrable tumour disease during the observation period) did the TgAb curve show significant oscillations. The percentage of measurable TgAb values at 6-monthly time-intervals during the observation period is illustrated in Fig. 1Go. In the time-interval of 1–1.5 years after the first examination, approximately half of the initially TgAb-positive patients became TgAb negative but in nearly one-third of them TgAbs persisted even longer than 3 years after the initial examination (range of the already measurable TgAbs 3–3.5 years after the initial examination: 7–149 U/ml; median 35 U/ml). Figure 2Go illustrates the decrease of TgAbs in an individual patient. The median serum half-life after the peak from the fitted curves of the 35 overall patients who had measurable TgAbs values in the course of the observation was calculated as 10 weeks (range 3–120 weeks).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1 Prevalence of positive TgAbs in DTC patients, subdivided into 6-monthly intervals after the initial examination. The percentage of patients with detectable TgAbs (>6 U/ml) decreased from 28% at initial examination to less than 10% during the 3 years of follow-up for DTC.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2 Decrease in TgAbs in a patient with papillary carcinoma (T1bN0M0) and concomitant Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Complete remission was achieved with thyroidectomy and two radioiodine therapies (1 month and 5 months after surgery). After 150 weeks, TgAbs still persist at low levels (8 U/ml), the half-life was calculated at 20 weeks as shown. Tg was always below the detection limit of 0.3 ng/ml (recoveries 96–109%).

 
Parameters influencing TgAb dynamics

Ninety of the total 112 DTC patients were available for follow-up evaluation of TgAb levels after 15–18 months after the initial examination (this definite time was chosen for interim results because most patients have finished their radioiodine therapy and have their diagnostic whole body scan between the 15th and 18th months). Of these, 16 (18%) still had positive TgAb levels. These could be divided into one out of seven patients with active tumour disease (percentage of positive TgAbs 17%), six out of 31 patients with thyroid remnants (19%) and nine out of 52 patients without remnant or tumour (17%); thus, the prevalence of TgAbs was similar in these three groups. Furthermore, patients with or without radioiodine accumulating tissue after 15–18 months did not differ significantly with regard to peak TgAb values (median (range) 274 (10–1531) vs 128 U/ml (7–1367)), TgAb half-life (10.5 (4–25) vs 10 weeks (3–120)) and 131I uptake prior to radioiodine therapy (5.4 (1–19) vs 4% (1–13)). Similarly, the presence or absence of TgAbs after 15–18 months in initially TgAb-positive DTC patients was not dependent from 131I uptake prior to radioiodine therapy (3.6 (1–19) vs 4.7% (1–18)). In contrast, the likelihood of negative TgAb testing 15–18 months after the initial examination significantly correlated with the height of initial and peak TgAb values, respectively which had been lower in patients who became TgAb negative after 15–18 months, than in patients with persistent TgAbs (median (range) 66 (7–659) vs 379 U/ml (39–1531), P < 0.01). The only tumour patient with persistent TgAbs also had a high initial TgAb value (715 U/ml). Peak TgAb values and TgAb values of the DTC patients 15–18 months after the initial examination were positively correlated (Pearsons’ r = 0.673; P < 0.001).

TgAbs did not influence the progression of the disease

After 3 years of follow-up, 103 of the 112 patients (92%) had complete or partial remission. Of the remaining patients, one had stable disease (persisting disseminated pulmonary metastases after three high-dose radioiodine therapies), five had progressive disease resulting in two tumour-related deaths and three had recurrent disease. Neither the initial TgAb levels, nor the presence of circulating TgAbs at the 15–18 month evaluation, nor the TgAb half-life were correlated with the course of the disease. As expected, all three recurrences were accompanied by rising Tg levels. Only one of the 17 patients with active tumour disease had demonstrable TgAbs (TgAbs initially 715, peak level 881 U/ml). This patient with moderately well differentiated papillary carcinoma (T4 N1 M1) was the only patient with incongruent low Tg levels (maximum 0.7 ng/ml under TSH stimulation) despite an extensive tumour mass (persistent radioiodine-accumulating bipulmonary metastases).

Interference of TgAbs with Tg determination in vitro

To examine in vitro interference of TgAbs with Tg measurements, dilution experiments were performed. All samples were obtained from DTC patients with proven metastases. Four Tg test sera with undetectable TgAbs were each diluted 1 + 1 with one Tg- and TgAb-free control serum and three Tg-negative sera with TgAb levels >1000 U/ml. In comparison with the control serum, dilution with TgAb-positive sera reduced the Tg values by as much as 32% (Table 2Go). Tg recoveries tended to be lower when diluted with TgAb-positive samples but remained in the range considered as undisturbed (70–130%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Tg measurements in dilution experiments. Equal amounts of Tg test sera with undetectable TgAbs (sample nos 1–4) were diluted 1 + 1 with Tg – and TgAb-free control serum and Tg-negative sera with high TgAbs levels (>1000 U/ml; sample nos I–III). TgAb sera dilution reduced both Tg values and recovery. Deviation = deviation from expected value.
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Prevalence and development of TgAbs in DTC patients

Previous studies have reported a higher prevalence of TgAbs in DTC patients than in the general population. Using a highly sensitive radioligand assay and a lower cut-off level, Spencer et al. (2) found a higher percentage of circulating TgAbs (25% of 213 DTC patients) as described in previous studies. Since only a few longitudinal studies on TgAb development which used less sensitive assays have been published (1, 7) and the more recent studies which used newer, more sensitive assays (2, 13) only analyzed TgAb and a Tg in cross-sectional data, we now present a longitudinal study using a sensitive direct radioligand assay for TgAb and an IRMA for Tg to correlate their development with residual tumour tissue and with therapeutic interventions. Several recent systematic histopathological studies have reported a higher prevalence of coexisting lymphocytic thyroiditis (1416) or Graves’ disease (17) in DTC patients before surgery compared with controls. In contrast, Rubello et al. (18) reported preoperative elevated TgAb levels >50 U/ml in 43 (11.2%) of 384 DTC patients, of which only five (1.3%) had coexisting autoimmune thyroiditis. It has not been proven whether TgAbs deriving from benign AITD also recognize epitopes on tumoral Tg from the respective patient and/or may cause interference with Tg measurement during oncologic follow-up. The TgAb kinetics in the course of patients with proven pre-existing lymphocytic thyroiditis did not differ significantly from that of patients without pre-existing AITD when evaluating only those cases in whom the initial TgAbs where higher than 40 U/ml. Quevedo et al. (11) measured TgAb values in the course of the first 3 years in 26 DTC patients of whom 19 had coexisting lymphocytic thyroiditis and found significantly higher TgAb values in these patients as compared with those without thyroiditis. Chiovato et al. (19) measured TgAbs using passive agglutination kits in the course of observation of 116 patients with DTC who initially had positive results for these antibodies, and of whom ten patients had coexisting Graves’ disease and 34 patients Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. The mean time of disappearance of TgAbs was 3 years and thus somewhat longer than in our study. Since in most patients the disappearance of TgAbs was associated with the disappearance of thyroid tissue, this difference may be due to a different ablative concept in radioiodine therapy: in nearly two-thirds of their patients thyroid tissue was still demonstrable 15–18 months after the initial examination, while this was only the case in 48% of the patients in our study. Similar to our results, Chiovato et al. (19) found no significant differences in the pattern of disappearance of TgAbs in patients with coexisting Hashimoto’s thyroiditis or Graves’ disease and in patients with focal auto-immune thyroiditis. Although we observed the tendency that patients with a higher peak TgAb value had a higher probability of still measurable TgAb values at the end of the observation period, the course of TgAbs in the individual patient displayed a large variability and cannot be predicted by one of the investigated parameters alone (initial TgAb value, initial amount of thyroid remnant tissue, coexisting AITD, initial prevalence of tumour tissue, persistence of scintigraphically demonstrable thyroid remnant or of tumour tissue at the time-interval 15–18 months after the initial examination). The use of TgAbs as a prognostic parameter in DTC remains controversial. While Rubello et al. (18) and Adil et al. (12) reported a higher frequency of relapse in association with persisting TgAbs after ablative therapy, the majority of authors (1, 8, 10, 11) found no correlation, in agreement with our data.

Interference of TgAbs with Tg measurement in DTC patients

The new commercial Tg immunoradiometric assay (IMA) have a lower detection limit far below 0.5 ng/ml with a satisfactory intra- and interassay precision (2022). However, several problematic aspects impeding the correct measurement and interpretation remain (23, 24). It is still controversial as to whether circulating TgAbs prevent reliable Tg measurement even when a recovery test is undisturbed. TgAb interference can produce either under- or overestimation of serum Tg. While Tg IMAs typically underestimate serum Tg when sera contain TgAbs, presumably because the endogenous Tg complexed with TgAbs cannot interact with the assay antibodies, RIAs can under-or overestimate Tg depending on the assay antibodies (2, 4). In contrast, Mariotti et al. (25) postulated that the low Tg values observed in some patients who also have TgAbs could be due to an accelerated metabolic clearance rate of the Tg–TgAb complexes.

On the other hand, circulating TgAbs – even in high serum concentrations – do not necessarily interfere with the Tg measurement (2), and reasons other than TgAb interference may cause unreliable Tg values. Finally, not only Tg but also TgAb assays can produce unreliable results, e.g. because of interfering high Tg concentrations (26) or epitope incompatibility between TgAbs and the radioligand (Tg) on the one hand and radioligand and assay antibodies on the other hand (27). Thus, the determination of TgAbs may not always be the ideal tool to authenticate Tg measurements. To solve this problem, Tg recovery tests have been introduced, allowing for a control as to whether a defined amount of Tg added to the patients’ serum sample is measured adequately. However, the usefulness of recovery tests and their value for recognizing Tg–TgAb interferences have been disputed. Some authors (2, 4) stress that recovery tests cannot be used to validate a Tg measurement in serum containing TgAbs. In particular, they have postulated that the epitopes on the exogenous Tg molecules (glandular origin) may differ from the epitopes of endogenous, tumorous Tg in the patients’ serum. In contrast, others have emphasized the importance of recovery tests instead of TgAb measurements (5, 6). Finally, some authors recommend the performance of recovery tests and TgAb measurements in parallel (13) to recognize all kinds of interference, including a possible high-dose-hook effect. We observed a significant proportion of patients with unexpectedly low or negative Tg values despite proven thyroid remnants or metastases. Their sera were more often TgAb positive or had higher levels of TgAbs than sera with Tg values above the detection limit. This was not merely a problem of the routine IRMA but was verified with a sensitive immunoluminometric assay using different antibodies. Thus, we found a correlation of low measurable Tg values and circulating TgAbs. The decrease in Tg values in the dilution experiments was also compatible with an in vitro interference of Tg and TgAbs in Tg IMAs despite an undisturbed recovery. However, the clinical implication is very limited, as only one patient had negative Tg associated with positive TgAb at some determinations, although she had metastatic DTC. She would have been picked up anyway because of a suggestive radioiodine scan.

In conclusion, our data add a note of caution to the interpretation of low or negative Tg values measured by IMA methods in the presence of circulating TgAbs as they might be caused by in vitro interference. In agreement with the guidelines for in vitro and in vivo procedures for thyroid diseases of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine (3) we recommend a screening test for TgAbs at the initial Tg measurement and further controls in cases of elevated TgAb values. We further recommend measurement of both Tg and TgAbs in all patients with higher risk profiles (e.g. tumour stage T4 or N1/M1, special histologic subtypes with poor prognosis or recurrent disease) with low or negative Tg values, even when previous TgAb measurements had been negative, employing sensitive direct assays and also taking into account measurable TgAbs values below the usual cut-off established for AITD. Normal recovery tests do not exclude false negative Tg values due to TgAb interference. However, they are essential to discover a high-dose-hook effect and other reasons for disturbed Tg measurements which are not recognized if only TgAb measurements are performed. Some of these problems may also be solved by simply using lower Tg amounts in a ‘low-dose’ recovery test as suggested by Morgenthaler et al. (20) and others. We hypothesize that a modified architecture of the recovery test regarding the origin and amount of added Tg may overcome most of the current problems of epitope variability and affinity.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

    1. Pacini F, Mariotti S, Formica N, Elisei R, Anelli S, Capotorti E & Pinchera A. Thyroid autoantibodies in thyroid cancer: incidence and relationship with tumour out-come. Acta Endocrinologica 1988 119 373–380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    2. Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kazarosyan M, Wang CC, Guttler RB, Singer PA, Fatemi S, LoPresti JS & Nicoloff JT. Serum thyroglobulin auto-antibodies: prevalence, influence on serum thyroglobulin measurement, and prognostic significance in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1998 83 1121–1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    3. Dietlein M, Dressler J, Grunwald F, Joseph K, Leisner B, Moser E, Reiners C, Rendl J, Schicha H, Schneider P & Schober O. [Guideline for in vivo- and in vitro procedures for thyroid diseases (version 2)]. Nuklearmedizin 2003 42 109–115.[Medline]

    4. Weightman DR, Mallick UK, Fenwick JD & Perros P. Discordant serum thyroglobulin results generated by two classes of assay in patients with thyroid carcinoma: correlation with clinical outcome after 3 years of follow-up. Cancer 2003 98 41–47.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    5. Ligabue A, Poggioli MC & Zacchini A. Interference of specific autoantibodies in the assessment of serum thyroglobulin. Journal of Nuclear Biology and Medicine 1993 37 273–279.

    6. Bourrel F, Hoff M, Regis H, Courriere P & Caron P. Immunoradiometric assay of thyroglobulin in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinomas: need for thyroglobulin recovery tests. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 1998 36 725–730.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    7. Rubello D, Girelli ME, Casara D, Piccolo M, Perin A & Busnardo B. Usefulness of the combined antithyroglobulin antibodies and thyroglobulin assay in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 1990 13 737–742.[ISI][Medline]

    8. Hjiyiannakis P, Mundy J & Harmer C. Thyroglobulin antibodies in differentiated thyroid cancer. Clinical Oncology 1999 11 240–244.

    9. Larbre H, Schvartz C, Schneider N, Delcourt AC, Maes B, Pochart JM & Vaudrey C. [Positive antithyroglobulin antibodies in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. What significance?]. Annales d’Endocrinologie 2000 61 422–427.

    10. Chung JK, Park YJ, Kim TY, So Y, Kim SK, Park DJ, Lee DS, Lee MC & Cho BY. Clinical significance of elevated level of serum antithyroglobulin antibody in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer after thyroid ablation. Clinical Endocrinology 2002 57 215–221.[CrossRef][Medline]

    11. Quevedo I, Campino C, Rodriguez Portales JA, Arteaga E, Lopez JM, Campusano C, Gonzalez G, Fardella C, Slater J, Valdivia L, Poggi H, Foradori A & Velasco S. > [Anti thyroglobulin antibodies in the follow up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: residual or relapsing disease markers?]. Revista Medica de Chile 2002 130 167–172.[ISI][Medline]

    12. Adil A, Jafri RA, Waqar A, Abbasi SA, Matiul H, Asghar AH, Jilani A & Naz I. Frequency and clinical importance of anti-Tg auto-antibodies (ATG). Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Pakistan 2003 13 504–506.

    13. Zophel K, Wunderlich G, Liepach U, Koch R, Bredow J & Franke WG. [Recovery test or immunoradiometric measurement of anti-thyroglobulin autoantibodies for interpretation of thyroglobulin determination in the follow-up of different thyroid carcinoma]. Nuklearmedizin 2001 40 155–163.[Medline]

    14. Kebebew E, Treseler PA, Ituarte PH & Clark OH. Coexisting chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and papillary thyroid cancer revisited. World Journal of Surgery 2001 25 632–637.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    15. Tamimi DM. The association between chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and thyroid tumors. International Journal of Surgical Pathology 2002 10 141–146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    16. Pisanu A, Piu S, Cois A & Uccheddu A. Coexisting Hashimoto’s thyroiditis with differentiated thyroid cancer and benign thyroid diseases: indications for thyroidectomy. Chirugia Italiana 2003 55 365–372.

    17. Gerenova J, Buysschaert M, de Burbure CY & Daumerie C. Prevalence of thyroid cancer in Graves’ disease: a retrospective study of a cohort of 103 patients treated surgically. European Journal of Internal Medicine 2003 14 321–325.

    18. Rubello D, Casara D, Girelli ME, Piccolo M & Busnardo B. Clinical meaning of circulating antithyroglobulin antibodies in differentiated thyroid cancer: a prospective study. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1992 33 1478–1480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    19. Chiovato L, Latrofa F, Braverman LE, Pacini F, Capezzone M, Masserini L, Grasso L & Pinchera A. Disappearance of humoral thyroid autoimmunity after complete removal of thyroid antigens. Annals of Internal Medicine 2003 139 346–351.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    20. Morgenthaler NG, Froehlich J, Rendl J, Willnich M, Alonso C, Bergmann A & Reiners C. Technical evaluation of a new immunoradiometric and a new immunoluminometric assay for thyroglobulin. Clinical Chemistry 2002 48 1077–1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    21. Wunderlich G, Zophel K, Crook L, Smith S, Smith BR & Franke WG. A high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serum thyroglobulin. Thyroid 2001 11 819–824.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

    22. Gorges R, Brandt-Mainz K, Freudenberg L, Frilling A, Grimm W & Bockisch A. [Kontinuierliche Sensitivitatssteigerung in der Schild-drusenkarzinom-Nachsorge im Verlauf dreier Thyreoglobulin-IMA-Generationen]. Nuklearmedizin 2003 42 157–166.[Medline]

    23. Feldt-Rasmussen U & Rasmussen AK. Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) in presence of thyroglobulin autoantibodies (TgAb). Clinical and methodological relevance of the interaction between Tg and TgAb in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 1985 8 571–576.[ISI][Medline]

    24. Spencer CA, Takeuchi M & Kazarosyan M. Current status and performance goals for serum thyroglobulin assays. Clinical Chemistry 1996 42 164–173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

    25. Mariotti S, Barbesino G, Caturegli P, Marino M, Manetti L, Pacini F, Centoni R & Pinchera A. Assay of thyroglobulin in serum with thyroglobulin autoantibodies: an unobtainable goal? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 1995 80 468–472.[Abstract]

    26. Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hoier-Madsen M, Hansen HS & Blichert-Toft M. Comparison between homogeneous phase radioassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for measurement of antithyroglobulin antibody content in serum. Relation to presence of thyroglobulin. Acta Pathologica Microbiologica Immunologica Scandinavica 1986 94 33–38.

    27. Benvenga S, Burek CL, Talor M, Rose NR & Trimarchi F. Heterogeneity of the thyroglobulin epitopes associated with circulating thyroid hormone autoantibodies in hashimoto’s thyroiditis and non-autoimmune thyroid diseases. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation 2002 25 977–982.[ISI][Medline]


Received 13 December 2004
Accepted 31 March 2005




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. A. Johnson and M. E. Tublin
Postoperative Surveillance of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Rationale, Techniques, and Controversies
Radiology, November 1, 2008; 249(2): 429 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. C.M. Persoon, T. P. Links, J. Wilde, W. J. Sluiter, B. H.R. Wolffenbuttel, and J. M.W. van den Ouweland
Thyroglobulin (Tg) Recovery Testing with Quantitative Tg Antibody Measurement for Determining Interference in Serum Tg Assays in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2006; 52(6): 1196 - 1199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Görges, R
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, O E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Görges, R
Right arrow Articles by Janssen, O E


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS