HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by d’Herbomez, M. Articles by Rouaix, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by d’Herbomez, M. Articles by Rouaix, N.

An analysis of the biochemical diagnosis of 66 pheochromocytomas

Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHRU, 59037 Lille, France, ¹ Laboratory of Biochemistry, Hospital Saint Philibert, 590160 Lomme, France, ² Departments of Endocrinology, ³ Biochemistry and ⁴ Endocrine Surgery, CHRU, 59037 Lille, France

(Correspondence should be addressed to M d’Herbomez; Email: m-dherbomez{at}chru-lille.fr)

Objectives: The aims of this study were to determine the performance of each variable, to define the optimal diagnostic thresholds and to determine the relative value of assaying chromogranin A (CgA).

Design: Prospective study.

Methods: Two groups of patients were studied: a control group of 71 patients and a group of 63 patients with a histologically-proven pheochromocytoma (52 pheochromocytomas and 14 paragangliomas). Fourteen of the patients had a family history of the disease. Eleven variables were assayed in each patient, i.e. the plasma and urinary concentrations of amines and their derivatives, and the CgA serum concentration.

Results: The study of the control group showed that all the serum assays gave false positive results (from 6 to 23%), as did four of the six urinary assays (from 2.9 to 12.3%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves varied from 0.689 to 0.992. The variables relating to the epinephrine pathway were significantly less expressed in the hereditary diseases than in the sporadic cases. The diagnostic thresholds of the three most efficient variables have been raised.

Conclusions: Plasma determinations of metanephrines are now an easy and convenient tool for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. However, in our study the best specificity was obtained with the urinary tests rather than with the plasma assays while the highest sensitivities were for the normetanephrine assays. The assay of CgA was highly efficient in diagnosing pheochromocytomas in the absence of renal insufficiency. By combining it with fractionated metanephrine assays, the sensitivities of the latter were increased.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Karagiannis, D. P Mikhailidis, V. G Athyros, and F. Harsoulis Pheochromocytoma: an update on genetics and management Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 935 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]