Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02113
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 154, Issue 3, 479-482
Copyright © 2006 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radetti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Adami, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radetti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Adami, S.

CLINICAL STUDY

Influence of two different GH dosage regimens on final height, bone geometry and bone strength in GH-deficient children

Giorgio Radetti, Gianluca D’Addato, Davide Gatti2, Mauro Bozzola1 and Silvano Adami2

Department of Paediatrics, Regional Hospital of Bolzano, via L Boehler 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy, 1 Department of Paediatrics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy and 2 Rheumatologic Department, Hospital of Valeggio (VR), Verona, Italy

(Correspondence should be addressed to G Radetti; Email: giorgio.radetti{at}asbz.it)

Objective: The aim was to investigate the effects of two different GH dosage regimens on growth, bone geometry and bone strength.

Subjects and methods: Final height; parentally adjusted final height; the metacarpal index (MI) SDS, the inner and outer diameters; and the total cross-sectional area (CSA), cortical CSA, medullary CSA and bone strength (Bending Breaking Resistance Index (BBRI)) were evaluated at the metacarpal site in two cohorts of GH-deficient children, treated with two different doses of GH. Group 1 (38 patients) was treated with 0.16 mg/kg body weight per week of GH and group 2 (37 patients) with 0.3 mg/kg per week.

Results: At the end of treatment, with group 1 vs group 2, height SDS was –0.84 ± 1.07 vs –0.46 ± 0.76, and parentally adjusted height SDS was 0.14 ± 1.08 vs 0.27 ± 0.82. Parentally adjusted relative height gain was 1.14 ± 0.89 vs 2.14 ± 0.72 SDS (P < 0.0001). MI SDS was 0.58 ± 1.31 vs –0.42 ± 1.54 (P < 0.005). MI SDS gain was 0.07 ± 1.41 vs –0.35 ± 1.85. There was no difference between groups in the outer and inner diameter, in the total and cortical CSAs, whereas medullary CSA was higher in group 2 (P < 0.05). BBRI was 10.02 ± 5.37 vs 11.52 ± 5.49 cm3, and BBRI gain was 3.33 ± 5.06 vs 6.88 ± 6.65 (P = 0.01). P values were assessed using student’s t-test.

Conclusion: Higher GH doses result in a greater height gain and improved bone strength.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Ari, V. K. Bakalov, S. Hill, and C. A. Bondy
The Effects of Growth Hormone Treatment on Bone Mineral Density and Body Composition in Girls with Turner Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4302 - 4305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 European Society of Endocrinology.