| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
CLINICAL STUDY |
1 Divisions of Endocrinology, and 2 Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical Centre, University of Essen, hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany, 3 Institute of Pathology, University of Essen, Essen, Germany and 4 Department of Surgery and Center of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, University of Essen, Essen, Germany
(Correspondence should be addressed to S Petersenn; Email: stephan.petersenn{at}uni-essen.de)
Objective: Pheochromocytomas are neoplasms generally characterized by the autonomous production of catecholamines. This study compared various biochemical parameters for the diagnosis of adrenal pheochromocytoma in patients with adrenal mass.
Design: One hundred and fifty subjects were studied, including 24 histologically proven pheochromocytomas, 17 aldosterone-secreting and 21 cortisol-secreting adrenal adenomas and 30 nonfunctioning adrenal masses, 16 patients with essential hypertension and 42 healthy normotensive volunteers. Spontaneous blood samples and 24-h urine samples were collected prospectively.
Methods: Plasma and urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine levels were measured by high performance liquid chromatography, whereas plasma and urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Putative ratio thresholds were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to balance between sensitivity and specificity.
Results: Plasma normetanephrine was found to be the best single parameter with the highest sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (95.6%) using a threshold of 126 pg/ml. In combination, plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine had a higher sensitivity of 95.8% with lower specificity (79.4%). All other combinations of plasma and/or urinary parameters demonstrated a lower accuracy.
Conclusion: Plasma metanephrines measured by RIA are reliable screening parameters for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. DeWitt Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Right Adrenal Masses: Report of 2 Cases J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2008; 27(2): 261 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. T Peaston and S. Ball Biochemical detection of phaeochromocytoma: why are we continuing to ignore the evidence? Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 6 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. J. Singh and G. Eisenhofer High-Throughput, Automated, and Accurate Biochemical Screening for Pheochromocytoma: Are We There Yet? Clin. Chem., September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1565 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. H.A. de Jong, K. S. Graham, J. C. van der Molen, T. P. Links, M. R. Morris, H. A. Ross, E. G.E. de Vries, and I. P. Kema Plasma Free Metanephrine Measurement Using Automated Online Solid-Phase Extraction HPLC Tandem Mass Spectrometry Clin. Chem., September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1684 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Pacak, G. Eisenhofer, A. Grossman, and I. Gavras The Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Mass N. Engl. J. Med., May 10, 2007; 356(19): 2005 - 2006. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. d'Herbomez, G. Forzy, C. Bauters, C. Tierny, P. Pigny, B. Carnaille, F. Pattou, J.-L. Wemeau, and N. Rouaix An analysis of the biochemical diagnosis of 66 pheochromocytomas Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 156(5): 569 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W.M. Lenders, J. J. Willemsen, G. Eisenhofer, H. A. Ross, K. Pacak, H. J.L.M. Timmers, and C.G.J. Sweep Is Supine Rest Necessary before Blood Sampling for Plasma Metanephrines? Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 352 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. C. Mitchell and F. E. Nwariaku Adrenal Masses in the Cancer Patient: Surveillance or Excision Oncologist, February 1, 2007; 12(2): 168 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
