Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1500489
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 150, Issue 4, 489-495
Copyright © 2004 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Thiel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Thiel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A.

Clinical Studies

Octreotide long-acting repeatable and lanreotide Autogel are equally effective in controlling growth hormone secretion in acromegalic patients

SW van Thiel, JA Romijn, NR Biermasz, BE Ballieux, M Frolich, JW Smit, EP Corssmit, F Roelfsema, and AM Pereira

Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands. s.w.van_thiel@lumc.nl

OBJECTIVE: Recently a new depot preparation of the long-acting somatostatin analogue, lanreotide Autogel was introduced for the treatment of acromegaly. Like octreotide long-acting repeatable (LAR), it has high binding affinity for the somatostatin receptor subtype SSTR 2 and less binding affinity for SSTR 5. We hypothesized that the ability to suppress growth hormone (GH) secretion in patients with acromegaly would be similar for these depot preparations. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: Seven patients (mean age+/-S.E.M. 48.4+/-7 years) on long-term octreotide LAR treatment at a monthly injection interval for a mean of 2.8 years were enrolled in the study. They underwent a GH secretory profile study with 10 min sampling for 24 h, 28 days after an injection. At 2, 4 and 6 weeks after the next injection fasting GH profiles (every 30 min for 3.5 h) and serum IGF-I measurements were measured. These investigations were repeated 12 months later, when the patients were on an individually titrated stable dose of lanreotide Autogel. RESULTS: Secretory characteristics and total 24 h GH secretion, estimated by deconvolution analysis of the 10 min 24 h plasma GH concentrations, did not show differences between these two long-acting somatostatin analogues. Both drugs were equally effective in GH and IGF-I suppression as measured at 2, 4 and also at 6 weeks following an injection. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of lanreotide Autogel and octreotide LAR was equal, notwithstanding that these drugs are administered in a different way and have different pharmacokinetics.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. D. Murray and S. Melmed
A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2008; 93(8): 2957 - 2968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. L Ronchi, E. Rizzo, A. G Lania, R. Pivonello, S. Grottoli, A. Colao, E. Ghigo, A. Spada, M. Arosio, and P. Beck-Peccoz
Preliminary data on biochemical remission of acromegaly after somatostatin analogs withdrawal
Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 158(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S W van Thiel, J J Bax, N R Biermasz, E R Holman, D Poldermans, F Roelfsema, H J Lamb, E E van der Wall, J W A Smit, J A Romijn, et al.
Persistent diastolic dysfunction despite successful long-term octreotide treatment in acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
B. Astruc, P. Marbach, H. Bouterfa, C. Denot, M. Safari, A. Vitaliti, and M. Sheppard
Long-Acting Octreotide and Prolonged-Release Lanreotide Formulations Have Different Pharmacokinetic Profiles
J. Clin. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 45(7): 836 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 European Society of Endocrinology.