Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1470323
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 147, Issue 3, 323-332
Copyright © 2002 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sartorio, A
Right arrow Articles by Liberati, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sartorio, A
Right arrow Articles by Liberati, D

Articles

An improved computational method to assess pituitary responsiveness to secretagogue stimuli

A Sartorio, G De Nicolao, and D Liberati

Laboratorio Sperimentale di Ricerche Endocrinologiche, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. sartorio@auxologico.it

OBJECTIVE: The quantitative assessment of gland responsiveness to exogenous stimuli is typically carried out using the peak value of the hormone concentrations in plasma, the area under its curve (AUC), or through deconvolution analysis. However, none of these methods is satisfactory, due to either sensitivity to measurement errors or various sources of bias. The objective was to introduce and validate an easy-to-compute responsiveness index, robust in the face of measurement errors and interindividual variability of kinetics parameters. DESIGN: The new method has been tested on responsiveness tests for the six pituitary hormones (using GH-releasing hormone, thyrotrophin-releasing hormone, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and corticotrophin-releasing hormone as secretagogues), for a total of 174 tests. Hormone concentrations were assayed in six to eight samples between -30 min and 120 min from the stimulus. METHODS: An easy-to-compute direct formula has been worked out to assess the 'stimulated AUC', that is the part of the AUC of the response curve depending on the stimulus, as opposed to pre- and post-stimulus spontaneous secretion. The weights of the formula have been reported for the six pituitary hormones and some popular sampling protocols. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The new index is less sensitive to measurement error than the peak value. Moreover, it provides results that cannot be obtained from a simple scaling of either the peak value or the standard AUC. Future studies are needed to show whether the reduced sensitivity to measurement error and the proportionality to the amount of released hormone render the stimulated AUC indeed a valid alternative to the peak value for the diagnosis of the different pathophysiological states, such as, for instance, GH deficits.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A Sartorio, M Jubeau, F Agosti, A De Col, N Marazzi, C L Lafortuna, and N A Maffiuletti
GH responses to two consecutive bouts of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy adults
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 311 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. Jubeau, A. Sartorio, P. G. Marinone, F. Agosti, J. V. Hoecke, K. Nosaka, and N. A. Maffiuletti
Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2008; 104(1): 75 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 European Society of Endocrinology.