Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1470103
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 147, Issue 1, 103-107
Copyright © 2002 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mongan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mongan, N.
Right arrow Articles by Lim, H.

Articles

Evidence that luteinising hormone receptor polymorphisms may contribute to male undermasculinisation

NP Mongan, IA Hughes, and HN Lim

Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Box 116, Level 8, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.

BACKGROUND: The luteinising hormone receptor (LHR) is necessary for the stimulation of androgen production and male genital development. It contains three protein polymorphisms: a leucine and glutamine insertion between codons 8 and 9 (LQ+) and two amino acid substitutions (N291S, N312S). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether these LHR polymorphisms are associated with male genital undermasculinisation or the androgen receptor polyglutamine repeat polymorphism (AR(Q)n), which contributes in some cases to the cause of genital undermasculinisation. METHODS: The LHR polymorphisms were assessed by PCR amplification of genomic DNA, followed by restriction enzyme analysis. The frequency of the LHR polymorphisms were compared between an undermasculinised male group (n=75) and a control group (n=55). RESULTS: LQ+ was not independently associated with the undermasculinised group (P=0.09), but it was associated with increased AR(Q)n within the undermasculinised group (P=0.02), particularly for AR(Q)n lengths >or=26 (P=0.002). In the undermasculinised group, homozygosity for N291 (872A/A) was more frequent (P=0.05), whereas homozygosity for N312 (935A/A) was less frequent (P=0.05). The combination of the presence of 872A/A and the absence of 935A/A showed a stronger association with the undermasculinised group than either polymorphism independently (P=0.006). The odds ratio of this genotype compared with any other, between the undermasculinised and control groups was 3.28 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33 to 8.08). CONCLUSION: LHR polymorphisms may contribute to genital undermasculinisation.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 European Society of Endocrinology.