Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1410313
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 141, Issue 3, 313-320
Copyright © 1999 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rigamonti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rigamonti, A.
Right arrow Articles by Muller, E.

Articles

Six-week treatment with hexarelin in young dogs: evaluation of the GH responsiveness to acute hexarelin or GHRH administration, and of the orexigenic effect of hexarelin

AE Rigamonti, SG Cella, N Marazzi, and EE Muller

Department of Medical Pharmacology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

In this study we evaluated, in six young (5-7 year-old) beagle dogs, the effects of a 6-week administration of hexarelin (250 microg/kg s. c. twice daily) on the GH response to an acute challenge with hexarelin or GHRH (2 microg/kg i.v.), delivered before and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. The GH peak response to acute hexarelin or GHRH initially increased, with a maximum observed at the 3rd week, and then decreased to basal values (GHRH) or less (hexarelin) at the 6th week. These data would indicate that hexarelin initially primed the pituitary to acute administration of further hexarelin or of GHRH, followed by downregulation of the GH response to hexarelin and preservation of the response to GHRH. We then studied the rebound increase in GH secretion after withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (4 microg/kg per h for 1.5 h), a likely stimulus of endogenous GHRH function. The pattern obtained was similar to, though not superimposable upon, that ensuing after acute hexarelin or GHRH administration. Parallel evaluation of the acute orexigenic effect of hexarelin evinced a different time-course of the behavioural response, namely an acute feeding response to hexarelin that was abolished at the 3rd week and returned to normal at the 6th week. The differing timing of the neuroendocrine or behavioural response to hexarelin would suggest the existence of different subtypes of central nervous system GH-releasing peptide receptors.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 European Society of Endocrinology.