Eur J Endocrinol
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1310258
European Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 131, Issue 3, 258-262
Copyright © 1994 by European Society of Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Välimäki, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, B L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Välimäki, M. J
Right arrow Articles by Riggs, B L.

Bone resorption in healthy and osteoporotic postmenopausal women: comparison markers for serum carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and urinary pyridinium cross-links

Matti J Välimäki, Riitta Tähtelä, James D Jones, James M Peterson and B Lawrence Riggs

Välimäki MJ, Tähtelä R, Jones JD, Peterson JM, Riggs BL. Bone resorption in healthy and osteoporotic postmenopausal women: comparison markers for serum carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen and urinary pyridinium cross-links. Eur J Endocrinol 1994;131:258–62. ISSN 0804–4643

We compared two highly specific markers for bone resorption–pyridinium cross-links (pyridinoline (PYR) and deoxypyridinoline (DPR)) in urine and carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) in serum – in 63 healthy postmenopausal women and 63 women with osteoporosis characterized by more bone resorption than bone formation. The ICTP, PYR and DPR levels were all higher, by 24% (p = 0.001), 16% (p = 0.05) and 25% (p = 0.004), respectively, in the osteoporotic women. For the merged groups, there were significant correlations between serum ICTP concentration and urinary PYR (r = 0.667, p < 0.0001) and DPR (r = 0.452, p < 0.0001) excretion; for the osteoporotic and normal women separately, the r values were 0.73 (p < 0.01) and 0.45 (p < 0.01) for PYR and 0.51 (p < 0.01) and 0.22 (p = 0.08) for DPR versus ICTP respectively. Weak correlations in linear regression between ICTP and various indices of bone formation (osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen) disappeared when the correlation between ICTP and pyridinolines was accounted for by calculation of partial correlation coefficients in multiple regression analysis. Serum ICTP concentration appears to discriminate between groups of normal and osteoporotic women as well as urinary pyridinium cross-links, which is thus far the most sensitive method for assessing bone resorption.

Matti Välimäki, Third Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, SF-00290 Helsinki, Finland







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 European Society of Endocrinology.